<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is “M.A. in Missional Church Studies” an Oxymoron? Can Seminary Education be Missional?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:28:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim River</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/comment-page-1/#comment-10861</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim River</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathancolquhoun1.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/#comment-10861</guid>
		<description>A couple of thoughts:

Discipleship in the Missional Church
Ethics in the Missional Church (the Holiness Code)
Public Preaching and Missional Teaching
Coaching for Excellence
Exegetical Biblical Studies 
Equipping All God&#039;s Missionary People to reach the Postmodern generation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of thoughts:</p>
<p>Discipleship in the Missional Church<br />
Ethics in the Missional Church (the Holiness Code)<br />
Public Preaching and Missional Teaching<br />
Coaching for Excellence<br />
Exegetical Biblical Studies<br />
Equipping All God&#8217;s Missionary People to reach the Postmodern generation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathancolquhoun1.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/#comment-447</guid>
		<description>David,  Your comments are all good.  But can I propose another starting point beside the curricula?  First let me give some thoughts&lt;br/&gt;1) As a college ministerial student I was not prepared for what I needed to face in 24 years of full time sr. leadership. What I was taught did not really prepare me.  With over 80 hours of seminary training I also discovered that it did a good job of filling my mind but little to prepare me for the real work in the trenches.  I expect many will disagree and tell me they were prepared. My general course were most helpful!  Really!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2) Truth is we cannot really make a missional difference with a new list of relevant classes in seminary education.  Why can&#039;t we invest another wineskin for training - internships - releasing - and ongoing training.  From experience real learning cannot just be a mind thing - real learning is on the job with mentoring/coaching etc.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Dave - Great discussion points!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Consider this:  Let&#039;s not send kids to Christian Colleges for ministry prep. When they do go m any emerge with so much debt they often cannot serve in ministry jobs and deal with living expenses as well as paying off the debt.  Seminary does even more to offer education of the mind and does not result in real learning that comes with actually doing it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Why not use our Community Colleges for generals and let&#039;s create on the job regional training centers with necessary courses in Theology and Mistry as suggested earlier.  We will raise up Missional Great Commission disciple driven leaders who:&lt;br/&gt;1)  Make disciples who make disciples who make disciples.&lt;br/&gt;2)  As disciples are made God will do what He said He will do, &quot;I will build My Church.&quot;  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The Missionary Church Midwest District under the direction of Supt. Steve Ortmann is launching this pilot program in the District with the goal of regional training centers and mentoring and coaching without the debt and with all licensing and ordination requirements taught in the Training Centers.  The nice thing is two-fold:  Students are prepared for the real deal and 2) They don&#039;t have the debt to pull them down.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Oh I can share so much more...  But since we are stuck in the Institutional carry on as usual deal - I fear, few will likely see become open enough to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,  Your comments are all good.  But can I propose another starting point beside the curricula?  First let me give some thoughts<br />1) As a college ministerial student I was not prepared for what I needed to face in 24 years of full time sr. leadership. What I was taught did not really prepare me.  With over 80 hours of seminary training I also discovered that it did a good job of filling my mind but little to prepare me for the real work in the trenches.  I expect many will disagree and tell me they were prepared. My general course were most helpful!  Really!</p>
<p>2) Truth is we cannot really make a missional difference with a new list of relevant classes in seminary education.  Why can&#8217;t we invest another wineskin for training &#8211; internships &#8211; releasing &#8211; and ongoing training.  From experience real learning cannot just be a mind thing &#8211; real learning is on the job with mentoring/coaching etc.</p>
<p>Dave &#8211; Great discussion points!</p>
<p>Consider this:  Let&#8217;s not send kids to Christian Colleges for ministry prep. When they do go m any emerge with so much debt they often cannot serve in ministry jobs and deal with living expenses as well as paying off the debt.  Seminary does even more to offer education of the mind and does not result in real learning that comes with actually doing it.</p>
<p>Why not use our Community Colleges for generals and let&#8217;s create on the job regional training centers with necessary courses in Theology and Mistry as suggested earlier.  We will raise up Missional Great Commission disciple driven leaders who:<br />1)  Make disciples who make disciples who make disciples.<br />2)  As disciples are made God will do what He said He will do, &#8220;I will build My Church.&#8221;  </p>
<p>The Missionary Church Midwest District under the direction of Supt. Steve Ortmann is launching this pilot program in the District with the goal of regional training centers and mentoring and coaching without the debt and with all licensing and ordination requirements taught in the Training Centers.  The nice thing is two-fold:  Students are prepared for the real deal and 2) They don&#8217;t have the debt to pull them down.</p>
<p>Oh I can share so much more&#8230;  But since we are stuck in the Institutional carry on as usual deal &#8211; I fear, few will likely see become open enough to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Hesiak</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Hesiak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathancolquhoun1.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/#comment-446</guid>
		<description>DF,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That actually helps a lot.  I know I always go back to my architecture stuff, but that’s what I know.  What you say reminds me of how a plan of a building isn’t “dropped out of the sky”…even if the architect THINKS it is!  AND…it reminds me of how much history and/or training is BEHIND that plan…whether it be training of an academic variety or an “unconscious” cultural/contextual kind of training that actually seems to be more typical, or that seems to reign moreso.  Also too…reminds me that my tests in my history of Architecture class…there were SOME “true/false” and/or “multiple choice” questions…but they were a small portion of the testing.  That reminds me of what you say, “…need not be &quot;systematic&quot; in the typical scientific textbook approach of the fundamentalists”.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As I hear folk like you say helpful things like this, my concern about systems is able to be more articulated and shot more clearly at its target too.  I think…much like how you speak of expository preaching in your book…it has a lot to do with CONTROL…”Pan” is, figuratively, the “god” who “holds things together” (or so we come to imagine).  I think in the picture you just painted God is left in his rightfully ordered place as the one who holds things together from the center.  With your idea of study of systematic (whatever), man isn’t trying to usurp God in that way.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; I am learning and growing.  Church sure is an interesting animal.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks and God bless,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DF,</p>
<p>That actually helps a lot.  I know I always go back to my architecture stuff, but that’s what I know.  What you say reminds me of how a plan of a building isn’t “dropped out of the sky”…even if the architect THINKS it is!  AND…it reminds me of how much history and/or training is BEHIND that plan…whether it be training of an academic variety or an “unconscious” cultural/contextual kind of training that actually seems to be more typical, or that seems to reign moreso.  Also too…reminds me that my tests in my history of Architecture class…there were SOME “true/false” and/or “multiple choice” questions…but they were a small portion of the testing.  That reminds me of what you say, “…need not be &#8220;systematic&#8221; in the typical scientific textbook approach of the fundamentalists”.</p>
<p>As I hear folk like you say helpful things like this, my concern about systems is able to be more articulated and shot more clearly at its target too.  I think…much like how you speak of expository preaching in your book…it has a lot to do with CONTROL…”Pan” is, figuratively, the “god” who “holds things together” (or so we come to imagine).  I think in the picture you just painted God is left in his rightfully ordered place as the one who holds things together from the center.  With your idea of study of systematic (whatever), man isn’t trying to usurp God in that way.</p>
<p> I am learning and growing.  Church sure is an interesting animal.  </p>
<p>Thanks and God bless,</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>David Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathancolquhoun1.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Jason ... my reference to prerequisites on this post are to the basic Biblical coursework (NT , OT ) and theology coursework that I think are necessary to lead any gathering thru faithfulness to Jesus Christ in these times. I believe you must be able to interpret the Scriptures faithfully ... this takes more than a casual read but an understanding of the historical interpretation given us down thru the ages thru the aspostles, and preachers of the church. You just can&#039;t lead a congregation with a &quot;dropped out of the sky&quot; interpretation ... In these times interpretation is so very important ... Likewsie, faithful interpretation requires understanding of the basic historical doctrines, where they came from, wnhat they mean. This need not be &quot;systematic&quot; in the typical scientific textbook approach of the fundamentalists ... a better way is &quot;creedal&quot;... or the entire &quot;drama&quot; or &quot;narrative&quot; of doctrine. But to think we can lead a congregation without the background of the &quot;Trinity,&quot; &quot;justification - sanctification&quot;... the various historical ways fo understanding ..to me would be perilous . Lack of such a historical girth has gotten us where we are at in the pragmatic churches, where we have commoditized Jesus to beyond historical  recognition. (The Life You&#039;ve Always Wanted byu Joel O.) &lt;br/&gt;I hope this helps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason &#8230; my reference to prerequisites on this post are to the basic Biblical coursework (NT , OT ) and theology coursework that I think are necessary to lead any gathering thru faithfulness to Jesus Christ in these times. I believe you must be able to interpret the Scriptures faithfully &#8230; this takes more than a casual read but an understanding of the historical interpretation given us down thru the ages thru the aspostles, and preachers of the church. You just can&#8217;t lead a congregation with a &#8220;dropped out of the sky&#8221; interpretation &#8230; In these times interpretation is so very important &#8230; Likewsie, faithful interpretation requires understanding of the basic historical doctrines, where they came from, wnhat they mean. This need not be &#8220;systematic&#8221; in the typical scientific textbook approach of the fundamentalists &#8230; a better way is &#8220;creedal&#8221;&#8230; or the entire &#8220;drama&#8221; or &#8220;narrative&#8221; of doctrine. But to think we can lead a congregation without the background of the &#8220;Trinity,&#8221; &#8220;justification &#8211; sanctification&#8221;&#8230; the various historical ways fo understanding ..to me would be perilous . Lack of such a historical girth has gotten us where we are at in the pragmatic churches, where we have commoditized Jesus to beyond historical  recognition. (The Life You&#8217;ve Always Wanted byu Joel O.) <br />I hope this helps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Hesiak</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Hesiak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathancolquhoun1.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>D.F.,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You mentioned somewhere up there in this post that there is a need for study of systematic theology, I think you said, &quot;pretty much because we just gotta have it&quot;, or something along those lines.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That didn&#039;t sit well with me.  From what I&#039;ve noticed, so far, this seems to be where we differ.  I am coming to a point, however, of looking for a properly ordered relatinship between systematic theology and the actual life of a community (or spiritual formation), rather than throwing any and all systems to the doghouse.  My coming to this new realization has been through a process of pain and struggle...not just through some stoic contemplation (just to give a glimpse of where I&#039;m coming from).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I say all that to ask if you have any more thoughts on this.  There seemed to be much more behind your &quot;becuase we just gotta have it&quot; than what you&#039;ve shared so far.  I&#039;m wondering if you have any futher thoughts on the matte, and how they might pertian to what I&#039;ve shared above about my struggles (probably shared by others in various or very different ways).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D.F.,</p>
<p>You mentioned somewhere up there in this post that there is a need for study of systematic theology, I think you said, &#8220;pretty much because we just gotta have it&#8221;, or something along those lines.</p>
<p>That didn&#8217;t sit well with me.  From what I&#8217;ve noticed, so far, this seems to be where we differ.  I am coming to a point, however, of looking for a properly ordered relatinship between systematic theology and the actual life of a community (or spiritual formation), rather than throwing any and all systems to the doghouse.  My coming to this new realization has been through a process of pain and struggle&#8230;not just through some stoic contemplation (just to give a glimpse of where I&#8217;m coming from).</p>
<p>I say all that to ask if you have any more thoughts on this.  There seemed to be much more behind your &#8220;becuase we just gotta have it&#8221; than what you&#8217;ve shared so far.  I&#8217;m wondering if you have any futher thoughts on the matte, and how they might pertian to what I&#8217;ve shared above about my struggles (probably shared by others in various or very different ways).</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/comment-page-1/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>David Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathancolquhoun1.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/#comment-443</guid>
		<description>reverend mommy ... &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We are all praying for Bob ... and waiting to hear the results of various therapy in about four weeks... we have hopes that Bob has years more with us ... not just months &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Blessings DF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reverend mommy &#8230; </p>
<p>We are all praying for Bob &#8230; and waiting to hear the results of various therapy in about four weeks&#8230; we have hopes that Bob has years more with us &#8230; not just months </p>
<p>Blessings DF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the reverend mommy</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>the reverend mommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathancolquhoun1.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/#comment-442</guid>
		<description>I understand the prognosis for Rob Webber is 6 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the prognosis for Rob Webber is 6 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathancolquhoun1.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Back again, thanks to Len :)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;WRT sexuality, a great resource for me has been Ronald Rolheiser&#039;s &quot;The Holy Longing&quot;.  His chapter on the subject is very good, the best I&#039;ve ever read. The overarching theme of the book is actually &quot;desire&quot;, which is another subject that gets written off, except to discuss it negatively.  I so appreciate his viewpoint.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Are the AEF lectures going to be made available afterwards, for those of us who can&#039;t go?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Dana Ames</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back again, thanks to Len <img src='http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>WRT sexuality, a great resource for me has been Ronald Rolheiser&#8217;s &#8220;The Holy Longing&#8221;.  His chapter on the subject is very good, the best I&#8217;ve ever read. The overarching theme of the book is actually &#8220;desire&#8221;, which is another subject that gets written off, except to discuss it negatively.  I so appreciate his viewpoint.</p>
<p>Are the AEF lectures going to be made available afterwards, for those of us who can&#8217;t go?</p>
<p>Dana Ames</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>David Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathancolquhoun1.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mike .. if anyone else is interested in a reading list on these courses ...or the ones that get finalized...let me know (e-mal me)We   won&#039;t have them complete until the summer. But if you&#039;re interested please e-mail me ... and I&#039;ll keep you all on a file to e-mail you the course reading lists when they are ready ..&lt;br/&gt; David Fitch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike .. if anyone else is interested in a reading list on these courses &#8230;or the ones that get finalized&#8230;let me know (e-mal me)We   won&#8217;t have them complete until the summer. But if you&#8217;re interested please e-mail me &#8230; and I&#8217;ll keep you all on a file to e-mail you the course reading lists when they are ready ..<br /> David Fitch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathancolquhoun1.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/is-%e2%80%9cma-in-missional-church-studies%e2%80%9d-an-oxymoron-can-seminary-education-be-missional/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Seeing as seminary isn&#039;t really my thing (I couldn&#039;t even finish one paper...), I would love a complete reading list for each of these courses.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing as seminary isn&#8217;t really my thing (I couldn&#8217;t even finish one paper&#8230;), I would love a complete reading list for each of these courses.  </p>
<p>Sage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

