EVERYTHING MUST CHANGE or EVERYTHING HAS CHANGED? A Question for my friend Brian McLaren on the eve of his DeepShift book tour coming to Chicago
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
It's kind of late in the game to review Brian McLaren's Everything Must Change. So much has already been said. But I thought I'd do a quick review anyway and raise some questions. I think the book is important and well done. And I'd like to throw my hat in the ring and say thank-you to Brian for the book. I also want to remind everyone that Brian's DeepShift Tour on the book is arriving right here next week in Chicagoland: Apr 4th and 5th at the First United Church in Oak Park. I am hoping to be there and urge others to join in the dialogue. I am reasonably sure a good price is still available for most of you. You can find out more right here.

Everything Must Change is vintage McLaren. The book tackles large issues, digesting significant data and theological material. Yet he writes with a prose that makes it all imminently accessible and compelling for those of us who don't have time or the scientific and/or theological acumen to really dig and understand the writers and issues he is engaging. In doing all this, Brian's writing is a service to the church of Jesus Christ.
There are many highlights in the book, too numerous for me to recount here. I'll just offer a few that were highlights for me of Brian's book Everything Must Change.
"Framing stories": Brian says we all have framing stories that make sense of the way we live in our worlds. Brian says that corporately as citizens of the West, our framing stories are failing (p. 68). The evidence of this is the global crises we find ourselves in. Brian's task then is to unfold the alternative framing story offered by Jesus as a counter story ( a counter narration) over against the dominant framing stories that so many of us, even Christians, live by. I think Brian draws closer here to those of us who have argued that the church is about the narration of a counter story to the one that is in power (I am thinking obviously of Milbank, Hauerwas and friends). Admittedly, there are stark differences, but thanks to Brian for opening this particulart way of post foundational of thinking to a much broader audience.
"Theocapitalism": In the book, Brian deconstructs the master framing stories that are killing us (with global crisis). One of these framing stories he calls theocapitalism. According to Brian, the ideology of theocapitalism narrates "the invisible hand" of the market as God and economic prosperity (meaning material wealth accumulation) as a sign of God's blessing. Theocapitalism narrates a world that blesses progress, economic growth, happiness through owning, competition and autonomous unaccountable money making as inherent goods (Pt 6 of the book). Admittedly, this is a critique which makes me smile. In the case of my own evangelical roots, it seems that the values/forces of multinational capitalism have infected everything we do including/and especially church. Thanks Brian for some helpful clarity here for the church.
"The Suicide Machine": Here Brian narrates how three systems - the prosperity system, the equity system, and the security system - work together to create a suicide machine - the earth's ecosystem. The three systems work together to create a system that is headed for destruction. This is best illustrated in the diagram on p. 66. Each system has a framing story which undergirds the system (for example theocapitalism for the prosperity system). I think the explanation and descriptions offered here are powerful, compelling and illuminating. This is the heart and the brilliance of the book. Brian helps us see the framing stories we are believeing which in turn allow us to cooperate with these destructive forces, even in the name of Christ. Brian then turns and offers Jesus and the Kingdom of God as a counter-story. Thanks Brian for the way your writing here exposes things.
MY QUESTIONS FOR BRIAN
My questions to Brian for this book are really the questions I bring with me to the whole emerging church movement. I think this book stands as a wonderful statement of some of the central strengths of the emerging church movement. The sentiments of this book are what draw me into the emerging conversation in the first place and why I try to participate. I have great hopes for the future of this movement. Yet this book also reveals to me some of the issues that remain to be addressed if (in my opinion) the emerging church movement is to have legs. These questions center on asking just how will everything be changed? Most of us resonate with the many critiques of the evangelical church emanating from the emerging church movement and its writers. But any constructive movement must have proposals for the way we embody the coming revolution ("the revolution of hope" as Brian labels it). I recognize this is an easy statement to make (just about anything). Yet I really do seek to engage this issue with seriousness and constructively for the furtherance of God's Kingdom in this movement. So please bear with me (give me a day or two) until this next post. In this next post I wish to pose two questions for Brian centering on the issue - Should it be EVERYTHING MUST CHANGE or EVERYTHING HAS CHANGED (with the empty tomb and the exaltation of Jesus Christ as Lord). I hope it will add to the upcoming day with Brian McLaren and the upcoming stop on the DeepShift Tour.
COMMENTS:
David - Thanks for this excellent synopsis.
I'm anxious to see where this all goes, but I sometimes wonder if we're not guilty of rushing to solutions. In my simplistic view the emerging voices came along and said, "Somthing's wrong." Now voices like Brian's are making a serious attempt at identifying what is wrong. Perhaps we need to sit with this for a while before moving forward... maybe this is even part of the repentance process.
(btw, I can't comment on Brian's writing without mentioning Hope in Troubled Times, which Brian references. Anyone who appreciates EMC needs to read this one as well.)
7:23 AM
thanks Mike for the comment... I think Brian does put forth some passionate pleas for changing the world...and at least assumes certain approaches to change in EMC ...
8:10 PM
I understand and appreciate the idea that we should be careful not to "rush into solutions", however I am not sure that is a great need than the need for change. Speaking only for my context, I have the least to lose by waiting while others pay the heavy price, day after day.
I agree with your assessment, David, and look forward to see where this goes.
Peace,
Jamie
7:01 AM
Interesting thoughts, David. I'm very new to the whole machine that is the emergent church, but I've always considered myself, to use their terminology, an "emerging" Christian. I've had problems with the dogmatism that is the faith of my upbringing, but will admit that there is comfort in having a set of things that simply "must" be true. When you go beyond those things, faith gets rattled and scary, but it becomes real. I've struggled with this for the past several years and only recently have come to see that, even as an agnostic or skeptical kind of person, I may have more faith than most who profess to possess it.
If that makes sense.
I'm eager for your next post.
Brian
8:44 AM
David,
Thanks for another great post. I have tried to keep Brian’s message in Everything Must Change simple and use it to help write a new story for my life. The main idea is to live a new (framing) story, a story founded on the belief that the way to make our world a better place is to believe in and be active participants in the story of the kingdom of God on earth. The old stories seems to be based on cultural misunderstandings of the Gospel story and the results speak for themselves, a world that doesn’t change much. In Jesus for President: Politics for Ordinary Radicals, Shane Claiborne speaks about the need for a new language. He writes that the way we speak (our stories) controls our lives. In the same way that you are what you eat, it's true that you are what you say. Our language changes the way we view the world. In my life, I hope to change the language of conversion. Conversion should reflect the best sense of the word - a people who are marked by the renewing of their minds and imaginations, who no longer conform to the pattern that is destroying the world. I am seeking to live out this new story by becoming a convert. What the world needs is converted people who believe so much in another world that they cannot help but to enact it. I’ve come to understand the emergent movement as a converted group of people who are committed to believing in and acting out this new story.
It will be great to read your post after the DeepShift Tour.
Blessings,
Brian
6:55 PM
"how will everything be changed?"
Excellent question, and I agree, that is where we need to go next. I don't just want to keep talking about the revolution. I want it to start!
4:39 PM
"Ivan Illich was once asked what he thought was the most radical way to change society; was it through violent revolution or gradual reform? He gave a careful answer. Neither. Rather, he suggest that if one wanted to change society, then one must tell an alternative story." Hirsch, "The Forgotten Ways"
12:12 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home